Skip to main content

Camping Ban, Disability, and Needs of Homeless: Portland’s revised camping ban brought about by a lawsuit advocating for disability rights may conflict with the needs of people experiencing homelessness.

By Scott Kerman

Living with multiple sclerosis for more than 20 years has taught me a lot about disability. Since my diagnosis, I have weathered ebbs and flows, experiencing temporary setbacks like bouts of diminished vision, loss of sensation in my feet and legs, impaired mobility and extreme fatigue. I do not use a mobility device so many people would not know that I have this disability.

Having experienced the challenges of a debilitating chronic illness firsthand, I deeply empathize with the difficulties encountered by people who are non-able-bodied –especially when trying to navigate the city during a homelessness crisis, where tents, carts and other personal survival items block sidewalks and public entrances. That conflict triggered a 2022 lawsuit brought by people with disabilities against the city of Portland. It also, in part, underlies the City Council’s recent adoption of a public camping ban that commits to removing obstacles from the public right-of-way. From this perspective, I understand the rationale behind the ordinance.

But that is not the only perspective I hold. As the executive director of Blanchet House, a nonprofit dedicated to supporting the unhoused by alleviating suffering and restoring dignity, I am acutely aware of the trauma and tragedy faced by our community experiencing homelessness. Over the past four years, the convergence of the housing, mental health and addiction crises has exacted a devastating toll on our community.

Homeless Community Populated by People with a Disability

Many of the individuals we serve at Blanchet House grapple with disabilities of their own, compounded by the harsh realities of life on the streets. From traumatic brain injuries to untreated chronic conditions to physical handicaps, the toll is staggering. Our volunteers are often shocked by how many of our meal guests have missing limbs and use mobility aids. And from this perspective, I worry about how enforcement of the ban, should it survive potential legal challenges, will threaten the survival of persons struggling with homelessness and disability.
But I also believe that if the city is to compassionately navigate enforcement of its new ban, it must focus on the words written into the ordinance itself.

The ordinance, revised from an earlier version, stipulates that camping is unlawful only when “reasonable alternate shelter” is available. “Reasonable” remains elusive with no clear definition. But for disabled individuals experiencing homelessness, reasonable shelter would be shelter that is truly accessible and supportive – a rarity.

In the short-term, state and local governments should identify which shelters meet that standard and keep an inventory of available beds – for instance, which locations not only can be reached by TriMet, but also have accessible restrooms, showers, dining areas and beds.

We Need an Active Inventory of ADA Accessible Shelter Beds

They should also take stock of what shelters can achieve that standard with modest changes or investments. The city should consult with agencies devoted to serving persons with disability to review and propose changes to make shelters accessible.

And in the long-term, local leaders must address the housing needs of our disabled, chronically ill and senior community members with a sustained investment and an intentional plan. We will need legislative support at the state level to ensure accessible and affordable housing – both temporary and permanent.

Until it can provide greater access, the city cannot feasibly meet the “reasonable alternate shelter” standard that the ordinance calls for. This would disappoint all involved, as the city’s intention to clear sidewalks and public spaces to comply with the ADA is an understandable one.

To the city’s credit, the ordinance’s repeated emphasis on “reasonable alternate shelter” speaks to the city’s understanding that homelessness is a very nuanced and individualized experience rather than a monolith. In addition, the draft of the city and county’s recently released Homelessness Response Action Plan recognizes the prevalence of disability among our houseless and housing-insecure community members, as well as the need to tailor our response to their unique needs.

Camping Ban is an Opportunity to Increase Services for Citizens with a Disability

But the truth of the matter is that whatever one’s health and wellness, everyone is likely to someday experience disability in some way, or at least be called upon to care for someone who is. Everyone who needs shelter and housing – individuals, families, seniors, persons in marginalized communities– will benefit from a focus on shelter and housing that meet the needs of persons with disabilities.

As we navigate these complex intersections of need and challenge, let us not lose sight of our shared humanity and the imperative to extend empathy and support to those most in need, both housed and unhoused. We must commit to providing safe and accessible neighborhoods for our community members with disabilities and housing for people who lack options for shelter and security.

Sign up for Blanchet House news.